Sam and I are always talking. I’m quite certain that after
we leave the noise level at Daruma Eco-farm will drop dramatically. That said, by
no means will a peaceful silence reign after our departure. Trains, roosters,
wailing cats, construction drills... This cacophony of sounds will continue
long after we leave.
However we both recognize that we are yappers- me
especially. One of our friends here at Daruma has now dubbed me “Moaning
Myrtle,” some kind of reference to my loud and “unique” (as Sam kindly
describes it) voice. This is a
step up from “Stupid Cow,” which this same friend called me when I tried
speaking more quietly and apparently was hardly audible. I just can’t win.
Rest assured that all of this name-calling and mockery stems
from a place of love. At this point I’m quite used to being picked on (I could
hardly say a word on the Bus without a heavily accented “Strong Island” being
shouted back at me in mimicry of my “unique” voice). In every group living
situation that I have experienced, I have been teased insistently. You might be
reading this and be thinking, “That is oh so sad! Poor, dejected Kelly.” But
have no fear. Sam is actually helping me to appreciate this fact. Both her and
I are just so ridiculous, loud, silly, talkative, and the like that people feel
comfortable around us.
The most amusing part of our talking is the distinction
between our voices. While my “unique” voice carries quite far, Sam speaks at much lower volume in a monotone and tends
to mumble (even worse than I do). Interjection by Sam: Kelly does NOT mumble. At mealtime, Sam will be participating in the
conversation with often no one hearing her but me. So usually people hear only me
talking and miss Sam’s constant stream of comments running underneath the
conversation.
We are quite the duo.
On Saturday the two of us reading two different books side
by side generated a fascinating and completely laughable discourse that spanned
three leisurely hours. Sam was finishing up Just
Food by James McWilliams and I was finally making a dent in Joel Salatin’s Folks, This Ain’t Normal. Both authors examine
the current food system in the U.S. but from notably disparate angles. Sam and
I, easily excitable, would frequently shout “Listen to this!” and read off a
statistic or opinion that shocked us. Being so easily entertained, the
distinctions and coincidental similarities between the arguments made our
banter even more rapid and energetic than usual. Here are some snippets of the
conversation. Perhaps you will find it educational and enlightening, If not,
thanks for reading this far. I recognize that my writing tends to be a stream
of thoughts that gets incredibly long. I would apologize but Sam says that her
grandmother will appreciate it, so this is for you Mrs. Krogulski.
S: According to James, cows are highly inefficient. Because they have to move around supporting a large body mass, they convert food energy very inefficiently. It takes 33 calories of energy to produce just 1 calorie of conventionally raised beef. Also according to James, a vegan diet is the most sustainable one you can have in the US. So, you are basically winning at life.
K: But what kind of cow is he talking about? Joel Salatin’s
practices on Polyface are so vastly different from the conventional factory
farm. Quote from Joel: “The cow, or domestic herbivore, is the most efficacious
soil-building, hydrology-cycling, carbon-sequestering tool at the planet’s
disposal.”
S: I guess it depends on the type of cow. Sure, raising
grass-fed beef requires fewer energy inputs, but most grass-fed operations
don’t use Salatin’s method of moving the cattle around in different enclosures, so the
land becomes degraded because the cows continually graze the same patches
of soil, which decreases biodiversity and depletes the soil of nutrients. No
good. Also, grass-fed operations require vast tracks of land for grazing (more
than conventional farms), and the type of expansion needed for this usually requires deforestation. That’s why is also doesn’t make sense to start
converting conventional farms into grass-fed operations because they simply
aren’t large enough to accommodate the large number of cattle we are accustomed
to.
K: It’s just interesting because your book is saying a vegan
diet is the way to go and Joel says that if we are aiming for biomimicry then
cows are a vital part of the system. We need grasses for soil building and
biodiversity, and grasses need herbivores. No natural systems exist without
animals. I agree with all of that, but I also see what your book is saying.
That a plant-based diet makes sense in today’s food system and can be the more
ecologically ethical choice.
S: I think that if you have to eat meat, the best option
would be to limit your meat intake to maybe once a week. Or reduce the amount
of meat you are eating at each meal because, at least in the US, we simply do
not have the land to raise cattle sustainably while maintaining our current
consumption of meat. It’s like Scott Stokoy, the farm manager of the Dartmouth
Organic Farm, says, “Meat should be a condiment, not a main entrée.”
[Time passes. We read. Mumble something here and there to
one another.]
K: Ha! Listen to this: “For all the soymilk and tofu lovers
out there, historically normal ingestion of soybeans requires
lacto-fermentation and eating volumes equivalent to condiments.” Argument
against veganism from Joel. Too funny.
[More time passing...]
S: Hahahaaha. James over here references Polyface: “The foodie
press has lionized these ventures [pioneer restorative companies], as have
locavores. Their underlying assumption has been the beauty of these renegade
operations – say Polyface Farms mentioned in Michael Pollan’s The Omnivores Dilemma – is in their
unique emphasis on localism. However, what also distinguishes them is that they
are making sacrifices in order to unilaterally eliminate passive subsidies.”
(About a minute goes by)
S: And another quote in support of Sir Joel. “Common examples of pioneer operations often involve
meat. Although I have spent much of this book questioning the long-term
sustainability of any sort of meat production, the fact remains that the
polycultural production of beef, chicken, and pork represents a far more
responsible use of resources than conventional methods do. These smaller
producers pass some of their higher costs on to consumers willing to spend more
money on meat produced in an environmentally friendly fashion.”
Okay that’s all that I wrote down and really all I can
remember right now. But that afternoon was a great example of Sam and Kelly
banter. It continues endlessly, often characterized by sharp spikes in volume
and rapidity when we get excited about something. Or we start singing.
We depart for Bangkok in just a few hours! More adventures
to come...
-Kelly
No comments:
Post a Comment